1,149 followers
RT @chengappa_kg: Finally some perspective about the classification criteria! First thing: these criteria should not feature in textbooks.
2,252 followers
RT @chengappa_kg: Finally some perspective about the classification criteria! First thing: these criteria should not feature in textbooks.
496 followers
RT @jrheum: Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE…
496 followers
RT @chengappa_kg: Finally some perspective about the classification criteria! First thing: these criteria should not feature in textbooks.
117 followers
RT @jrheum: Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE…
38 followers
RT @chengappa_kg: Finally some perspective about the classification criteria! First thing: these criteria should not feature in textbooks.
392 followers
RT @jrheum: Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE…
247 followers
RT @jrheum: Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE…
109 followers
RT @jrheum: Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE…
139 followers
RT @jrheum: Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE…
142 followers
RT @CiprianJurcut: An interesting Editorial (The Journal of Rheumatology): "In medical practice, our main concern is how to best assist the…
67 followers
RT @jrheum: Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE…
74 followers
RT @jrheum: Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE…
1,424 followers
RT @jrheum: Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE…
730 followers
Finally some perspective about the classification criteria! First thing: these criteria should not feature in textbooks.
438 followers
An interesting Editorial (The Journal of Rheumatology): "In medical practice, our main concern is how to best assist the patient who seeks our help. The name of the disease or the pathological aberration behind the illness are only secondary."
438 followers
"In medical practice, our main concern is how to best assist the patient who seeks our help. The name of the disease or the pathological aberration behind the illness are only secondary".
269 followers
RT @jrheum: Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE…
1,463 followers
RT @jrheum: Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE…
888 followers
RT @jrheum: Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE…
9,937 followers
Editorial Are Disease Classification Criteria for Diagnosis or for Research? In Fact, for Neither 📰 https://t.co/GSvG9XTZIE #disease #classification #diagnosis #research https://t.co/Ho7BcX368v